The application of cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan to become the next chancellor of Oxford University has sparked significant debate, according to a column for The Guardian.

Khan, who has previously made controversial remarks—including labelling Salman Rushdie a “blasphemer” and calling Osama bin Laden a “martyr”—is viewed with scepticism by many.

British journalist Catherine Bennett in her opinion has written that Pakistan’s former prime minister’s comments on sensitive topics, such as women’s role in cases of sexual assault and his support for the Taliban’s stance on women’s education, have raised eyebrows. Khan has suggested that women should take measures to avoid “temptation,” echoing sentiments that have been widely criticized.

These opinions, while they may resonate with some, could potentially deter other candidates from vying for the prestigious position. The situation has led to speculation about how Khan’s views will be received by the Oxford community, which values inclusivity and progressive ideals.

Khan is being promoted as a potential successor to Chris Patten, the outgoing chancellor of Oxford University. Conservative peer Lord Hannan has praised Khan as “a towering figure” who would be an excellent choice for the prestigious role.

The chancellorship, which lasts for a decade, involves both administrative responsibilities and presiding over key ceremonies—tasks that require accessibility and public engagement. Khan, currently serving a lengthy prison sentence that his supporters claim is politically motivated, would need to embody the values of Oxford, particularly in light of ongoing debates about free speech on campus.

Patten, known for his contributions to discussions on academic freedom, has previously warned against stifling free expression, contrasting Oxford with institutions in countries like China that “suppress dissent.” Khan’s previous comments, including admiration for the Chinese Communist Party and its “controversial practices” regarding human rights, raise concerns about his alignment with the university’s values.

Despite such issues, Khan enjoys significant support, with some attributing his candidacy to deep-rooted alliances within the cricket community and a broader admiration for his persona. As the online voting for the chancellorship has closed, many are watching closely to see how Khan’s complex history will affect his chances and what it reveals about the university’s priorities.

The PTI founder’s bid for the chancellorship of Oxford University has drawn criticism, with some commentators suggesting it sends a troubling message regarding the university’s values, particularly towards its female students. Journalist Peter Oborne remarked that Khan’s candidacy seems designed to insult women at Oxford, highlighting the incongruity of his past remarks and actions.

Despite reports that Khan now expresses interest in “diversity, equality, and inclusion,” many question his sincerity. Critics argue that a genuinely decent candidate would reconsider entering a race perceived as perpetuating the longstanding male dominance of university leadership. The current lineup of candidates has been described as uninspiring, with some likening it to an odd assortment of individuals lacking serious qualifications.

Also, read this

PTI govt was trying to ‘resettle’ TTP in Pakistan: Imran Khan

No other alternative to Taliban in Afghanistan, PM Imran tells world

Imran Khan, the cricket star who ditched playboy image to rule Pakistan

In contrast, one standout candidate has emerged: Lady Elish Angiolini, a respected lawyer and former procurator fiscal of Scotland. If elected, she aims to improve accessibility for underprivileged students at Oxford. Angiolini has a distinguished career, including roles as principal of St Hugh’s College and chair of significant inquiries into serious societal issues. Her dedication to addressing gender disparities in academia makes her a compelling choice for the chancellorship.

As the election approaches, many hope that Angiolini’s leadership would be more aligned with the values of inclusivity and equality, standing in stark contrast to Khan’s controversial history and the Taliban’s ideology. The upcoming vote will be closely watched as it reflects Oxford’s commitment to its principles.