DeepSeek's new AI model is by far the cheapest of well-known models to run, research firm says

Updated 03 Aug, 2026 03:24pm 2 min read

A version of Chinese startup DeepSeek’s flagship AI model is by ‌far the least expensive to run on benchmark tests among well-known models globally and more than 100 times cheaper to run than Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5, according to a research firm.

DeepSeek, which sources have said is preparing for a potential IPO, officially released its V4-Flash ​model on Friday, its latest attempt to regain momentum by doing what it is best known for - ​offering ultra-low-cost AI alternatives.

The startup’s R1 model became a global sensation in early 2025, triggering ⁠a selloff in global technology stocks and raising questions about the large amounts US companies were spending on ​AI.

DeepSeek’s V4-Flash charges $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens, according to research firm Artificial Analysis. A ​token is a unit of data used to measure AI usage.

San Francisco-based Artificial Analysis estimated V4-Flash’s average cost at 3 cents per test, compared with 86 cents for Kimi K3 from Chinese rival Moonshot AI, $1.86 for OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol and $3.15 for Claude Fable 5.

The ​comparison provides a more realistic measure of value than pricing alone because it accounts for the amount of ​data a model must process and generate to complete a task.

A model with a low headline price can still prove expensive ‌if it ⁠requires significantly more steps to produce an answer.

DeepSeek once commanded most of the headlines about Chinese AI development but was quickly besieged by many domestic rivals, including other startups such as Moonshot, MiniMax and Z.AI as well as tech giants like ByteDance and Alibaba.

All are vying with US tech firms for global adoption, targeting businesses seeking cheaper ​ways to deploy AI ​at scale.

Artificial Analysis said DeepSeek’s ⁠V4-Flash model scored 50 out of 100 on its Intelligence Index, which combines results from nine benchmarks spanning coding, reasoning and workplace-style assignments.

That’s the same score as Google’s ​Gemini 3.6 Flash, and one point behind Meta’s Muse Spark 1.1 and GLM-5.2 ​from Z.AI, which ⁠is also known as Zhipu.

Moonshot’s Kimi K3, however, scored a 57 while Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5, Fable 5, and OpenAI GPT-5.6 scored nine or more points higher.

DeepSeek is also preparing a more powerful version of its model, called the ⁠V4-Pro.

It ​has not given a date for that version’s official release.

Separately on ​Monday, Alibaba unveiled its largest and most capable artificial-intelligence model to date, the Qwen3.8-Max, which is not far behind in size when compared with an ​offering from domestic rival Moonshot AI launched last month.

Read Comments