<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Technology</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 13:19:06 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 13:19:06 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>Meta accuses Australia of violating US free trade deal</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330459853/meta-accuses-australia-of-violating-us-free-trade-deal</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meta accused Australia of violating a free trade agreement with the US by proposing a new tax on certain tech giants which do not strike licensing deals with local media, escalating a dispute which has simmered for half a decade.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The $1.6 trillion Facebook and Instagram owner said a proposal to tax platforms 2.25% of all Australian ​revenue — including revenue unrelated to social media — was “indefensible” and went further than actions which had prompted a ​response by the US government.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meta has &lt;a rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" class="link--external" href="https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/australia-charge-big-tech-companies-2-levy-unless-they-strike-local-news-deals-2026-04-28/"&gt;previously said&lt;/a&gt; it opposed the so-called news bargaining incentive, for ⁠which Australia’s centre-left government is considering industry submissions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But its latest missive shows how the law risks stirring ​up geopolitical tension between the allies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The tax “plainly violates the commitments Australia and the United States made in their bilateral ​Free Trade Agreement, which commits Australia to grant American companies ‘treatment no less favourable’ than Australian peers”, Meta said in a blog post published on Thursday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By drawing on the tech firms’ total domestic revenue, the Australian tax was “even broader than existing digital services taxes ​enacted by some governments, which resulted in the United States initiating trade actions”, the post added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“We encourage any government ​considering a similar approach to look carefully at what this model actually represents.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A spokesperson for Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino, who would ‌be ⁠responsible for overseeing the tax, said the government remained committed to the change and any takings would be distributed back to the news media industry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue of making social media companies reimburse news outlets for content that drives clicks has been a point of contention between Australia and Meta since 2021, when the country became the first to ​pass a law forcing ​the platforms to negotiate deals ⁠or face government arbitration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After briefly blocking all news feeds in Australia, Meta agreed on deals with most major outlets, but in 2024, it said it was stopping paying for ​news.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of installing an arbitrator, the government said it would switch to a ​new model ⁠of charging a tax instead.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It also expanded the list of companies it applied to, from Meta and Google to Meta, Google and TikTok.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google had struck deals under the previous model but had previously said it opposed the proposed tax.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under ⁠the current ​Trump administration, Australia’s effort to regulate mostly US-based tech firms has ​emerged as a flashpoint.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A US congressional committee has called for Australia’s internet regulator to testify about &lt;a rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" class="link--external" href="https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/us-congress-seeks-testimony-australias-internet-regulator-2025-11-20/"&gt;what it has called&lt;/a&gt; a regime of censoring ​American free speech.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The regulator has not yet said if she will agree.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>Meta accused Australia of violating a free trade agreement with the US by proposing a new tax on certain tech giants which do not strike licensing deals with local media, escalating a dispute which has simmered for half a decade.</strong></p>
<p>The $1.6 trillion Facebook and Instagram owner said a proposal to tax platforms 2.25% of all Australian ​revenue — including revenue unrelated to social media — was “indefensible” and went further than actions which had prompted a ​response by the US government.</p>
<p>Meta has <a rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" class="link--external" href="https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/australia-charge-big-tech-companies-2-levy-unless-they-strike-local-news-deals-2026-04-28/">previously said</a> it opposed the so-called news bargaining incentive, for ⁠which Australia’s centre-left government is considering industry submissions.</p>
<p>But its latest missive shows how the law risks stirring ​up geopolitical tension between the allies.</p>
<p>The tax “plainly violates the commitments Australia and the United States made in their bilateral ​Free Trade Agreement, which commits Australia to grant American companies ‘treatment no less favourable’ than Australian peers”, Meta said in a blog post published on Thursday.</p>
<p>By drawing on the tech firms’ total domestic revenue, the Australian tax was “even broader than existing digital services taxes ​enacted by some governments, which resulted in the United States initiating trade actions”, the post added.</p>
<p>“We encourage any government ​considering a similar approach to look carefully at what this model actually represents.”</p>
<p>A spokesperson for Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino, who would ‌be ⁠responsible for overseeing the tax, said the government remained committed to the change and any takings would be distributed back to the news media industry.</p>
<p>The issue of making social media companies reimburse news outlets for content that drives clicks has been a point of contention between Australia and Meta since 2021, when the country became the first to ​pass a law forcing ​the platforms to negotiate deals ⁠or face government arbitration.</p>
<p>After briefly blocking all news feeds in Australia, Meta agreed on deals with most major outlets, but in 2024, it said it was stopping paying for ​news.</p>
<p>Instead of installing an arbitrator, the government said it would switch to a ​new model ⁠of charging a tax instead.</p>
<p>It also expanded the list of companies it applied to, from Meta and Google to Meta, Google and TikTok.</p>
<p>Google had struck deals under the previous model but had previously said it opposed the proposed tax.</p>
<p>Under ⁠the current ​Trump administration, Australia’s effort to regulate mostly US-based tech firms has ​emerged as a flashpoint.</p>
<p>A US congressional committee has called for Australia’s internet regulator to testify about <a rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" class="link--external" href="https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/us-congress-seeks-testimony-australias-internet-regulator-2025-11-20/">what it has called</a> a regime of censoring ​American free speech.</p>
<p>The regulator has not yet said if she will agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Technology</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330459853</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 10:29:55 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Reuters)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2026/06/0410293266e21cd.webp" type="image/webp" medium="image" height="480" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2026/06/0410293266e21cd.webp"/>
        <media:title>Reuters file</media:title>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
