<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Business &amp; Economy</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 15:02:34 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 15:02:34 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>US takes step to halt Nvidia AI chip shipments to Chinese firms outside China</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330459722/us-takes-step-to-halt-nvidia-ai-chip-shipments-to-chinese-firms-outside-china</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The US Department of Commerce on Sunday moved to close a potential loophole that may have led companies to export the world’s most advanced chips — like Nvidia’s most sophisticated Blackwell processors — to subsidiaries of Chinese companies located outside China.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The unexpected guidance suggests that the United States’ best AI chips may have been making ​their way to the subsidiaries of Chinese AI firms based in places such as Malaysia, despite broader US efforts to ​starve Chinese firms of semiconductors needed to develop critical AI capabilities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new guidance was posted on the ⁠Commerce Department’s website on Sunday after a paper about the loophole circulated in Washington, according to people familiar with the matter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The paper, a copy of which was seen by Reuters, says “the floodgates have quietly opened.” Dated Friday, the paper does not list any ​author.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is unclear how many of the chips have been exported in the year that the Trump administration left the door open.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One chip industry source with deep supply-chain knowledge estimated it was in the hundreds of thousands.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the unusual weekend guidance, the department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) said it ​would enforce license requirements for advanced chips to entities headquartered in China when the entities were located outside China.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“BIS issued guidance clarifying ​export license requirements that have been in place since 2023,” a bureau spokesperson said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“BIS will continue to enforce export controls rigorously to safeguard critical ‌American technology.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ⁠new guidance does not change anything for Nvidia, a company official said, adding that it could not ship the chips because the Commerce Department had clearly imposed a license requirement on Nvidia in a letter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AMD, another big producer of sought-after AI chips, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Commerce Department created the opening when it announced in May 2025 that it would not be enforcing ​the AI Diffusion rule issued ​in the last days of ⁠the Biden administration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rule had licensing requirements governing global access to AI chips.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Former State Department official Chris McGuire, an expert on technology and national security, said in a social media post on Sunday ​that the loophole allowed the overseas subsidiaries of Chinese companies to buy Nvidia Blackwell chips without ​a license.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“This is a ⁠HUGE problem,” he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Chinese companies have been buying these chips, very likely at scale,” McGuire said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McGuire said the guidance closes the loophole, but leaves another open.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That loophole drops the requirement that Taiwan-based TSMC and other foundries do extra due diligence to ensure the high-end AI chips ⁠they ​are making are not for Chinese front companies. He said that the issue was not ​fixed by the guidance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A spokesman for TSMC declined to comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition, the new guidance does not require data centres to stop using the chips or cut off servicing ​of the advanced computing items such as servers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>The US Department of Commerce on Sunday moved to close a potential loophole that may have led companies to export the world’s most advanced chips — like Nvidia’s most sophisticated Blackwell processors — to subsidiaries of Chinese companies located outside China.</strong></p>
<p>The unexpected guidance suggests that the United States’ best AI chips may have been making ​their way to the subsidiaries of Chinese AI firms based in places such as Malaysia, despite broader US efforts to ​starve Chinese firms of semiconductors needed to develop critical AI capabilities.</p>
<p>The new guidance was posted on the ⁠Commerce Department’s website on Sunday after a paper about the loophole circulated in Washington, according to people familiar with the matter.</p>
<p>The paper, a copy of which was seen by Reuters, says “the floodgates have quietly opened.” Dated Friday, the paper does not list any ​author.</p>
<p>It is unclear how many of the chips have been exported in the year that the Trump administration left the door open.</p>
<p>One chip industry source with deep supply-chain knowledge estimated it was in the hundreds of thousands.</p>
<p>In the unusual weekend guidance, the department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) said it ​would enforce license requirements for advanced chips to entities headquartered in China when the entities were located outside China.</p>
<p>“BIS issued guidance clarifying ​export license requirements that have been in place since 2023,” a bureau spokesperson said.</p>
<p>“BIS will continue to enforce export controls rigorously to safeguard critical ‌American technology.”</p>
<p>The ⁠new guidance does not change anything for Nvidia, a company official said, adding that it could not ship the chips because the Commerce Department had clearly imposed a license requirement on Nvidia in a letter.</p>
<p>AMD, another big producer of sought-after AI chips, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.</p>
<p>The Commerce Department created the opening when it announced in May 2025 that it would not be enforcing ​the AI Diffusion rule issued ​in the last days of ⁠the Biden administration.</p>
<p>The rule had licensing requirements governing global access to AI chips.</p>
<p>Former State Department official Chris McGuire, an expert on technology and national security, said in a social media post on Sunday ​that the loophole allowed the overseas subsidiaries of Chinese companies to buy Nvidia Blackwell chips without ​a license.</p>
<p>“This is a ⁠HUGE problem,” he said.</p>
<p>“Chinese companies have been buying these chips, very likely at scale,” McGuire said.</p>
<p>McGuire said the guidance closes the loophole, but leaves another open.</p>
<p>That loophole drops the requirement that Taiwan-based TSMC and other foundries do extra due diligence to ensure the high-end AI chips ⁠they ​are making are not for Chinese front companies. He said that the issue was not ​fixed by the guidance.</p>
<p>A spokesman for TSMC declined to comment.</p>
<p>In addition, the new guidance does not require data centres to stop using the chips or cut off servicing ​of the advanced computing items such as servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Business &amp; Economy</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330459722</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 12:34:50 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Reuters)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2026/06/011233376265e74.webp" type="image/webp" medium="image" height="480" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2026/06/011233376265e74.webp"/>
        <media:title>Nvidia GB10 Grace Blackwell Superchip is displayed at the company's GTC conference in San Jose, California. -- Reuters file</media:title>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
