<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Crime &amp; Court</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 17:56:47 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 17:56:47 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>Court orders K-Electric to pay Rs13.5 million in electrocution case</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330459082/court-orders-k-electric-to-pay-rs135-million-in-electrocution-case</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A court in Karachi on Saturday found K-Electric negligent and ordered the company to pay Rs13.5 million in compensation to the family of Sheikh Saad Ahmed, who died after being electrocuted while saving a child during rainfall.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The court directed that the compensation be paid within 90 days.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The case was heard by the Senior Civil Judge (Central), who announced a detailed verdict and imposed the financial penalty on K-Electric for failing to ensure public safety.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The petitioner’s lawyer, Usman Farooq, told the court that Sheikh Saad Ahmed, the sole breadwinner of his family, was attempting to rescue a child from a live electric pole in 2019 when he was fatally electrocuted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the lawyer, local residents had previously reported current leakage from the pole to K-Electric, but no effective action was taken.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He added that the deceased supported his family’s expenses while pursuing his education.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;K-Electric’s lawyer, meanwhile, argued that the pole in question did not belong to the company and carried wires from private generators, telephone lines, and cable operators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He claimed the electrocution resulted from the generator’s wiring and that K-Electric’s installations were fully safe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He also contended that the victim endangered his own life by approaching the hazardous site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The court, however, ruled that utility providers carry an exceptional duty to protect the public.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It noted that the presence of wires from other entities does not absolve K-Electric of responsibility.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The court emphasised that electricity leakage from a public pole constitutes clear negligence, while efforts to save a life cannot be considered negligence, as the law views attempts to save human life leniently.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under the Fatal Accidents Act, the court ordered K-Electric to pay Rs13.5 million to the victim’s family within 90 days.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>A court in Karachi on Saturday found K-Electric negligent and ordered the company to pay Rs13.5 million in compensation to the family of Sheikh Saad Ahmed, who died after being electrocuted while saving a child during rainfall.</strong></p>
<p>The court directed that the compensation be paid within 90 days.</p>
<p>The case was heard by the Senior Civil Judge (Central), who announced a detailed verdict and imposed the financial penalty on K-Electric for failing to ensure public safety.</p>
<p>The petitioner’s lawyer, Usman Farooq, told the court that Sheikh Saad Ahmed, the sole breadwinner of his family, was attempting to rescue a child from a live electric pole in 2019 when he was fatally electrocuted.</p>
<p>According to the lawyer, local residents had previously reported current leakage from the pole to K-Electric, but no effective action was taken.</p>
<p>He added that the deceased supported his family’s expenses while pursuing his education.</p>
<p>K-Electric’s lawyer, meanwhile, argued that the pole in question did not belong to the company and carried wires from private generators, telephone lines, and cable operators.</p>
<p>He claimed the electrocution resulted from the generator’s wiring and that K-Electric’s installations were fully safe.</p>
<p>He also contended that the victim endangered his own life by approaching the hazardous site.</p>
<p>The court, however, ruled that utility providers carry an exceptional duty to protect the public.</p>
<p>It noted that the presence of wires from other entities does not absolve K-Electric of responsibility.</p>
<p>The court emphasised that electricity leakage from a public pole constitutes clear negligence, while efforts to save a life cannot be considered negligence, as the law views attempts to save human life leniently.</p>
<p>Under the Fatal Accidents Act, the court ordered K-Electric to pay Rs13.5 million to the victim’s family within 90 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Crime &amp; Court</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330459082</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 15:52:39 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Web Desk)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2026/05/161550017bd67ec.webp" type="image/webp" medium="image" height="720" width="1200">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2026/05/161550017bd67ec.webp"/>
        <media:title>File photo</media:title>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
