The Competition Commission of India (CCI) said in an April 8 order that Apple has not submitted details of its financials ​and its views on the investigation since October 2024, and instead cited a separate case pending in the ​Delhi High Court where the company has challenged India’s entire antitrust penalty law.

The CCI typically requires financial ⁠information from companies to calculate penalties when they are found to have contravened the law.

Apple, which denies any wrongdoing ​in the case, has said it fears it could be fined up to $38 billion if the watchdog uses its global turnover ​to calculate penalties in the case.

Apple has “been afforded adequate opportunities to file” its objections or suggestions to the investigation report and has also “not submitted the requisite financial information,” said the CCI order, which is not public but was reviewed by Reuters.

Apple and the CCI did not respond ​to Reuters queries.

The Indian case is among the many Apple faces around the globe for alleged antitrust breaches.

India ​is a key market for Apple where its iPhones have an 9% market share, compared to just 4% two years ago, Counterpoint Research ‌says.

Although ⁠the CCI has given Apple two more weeks to file its responses, it has for the first time fixed a final hearing date of May 21.

Hearing date significant date

Lawyers said the setting of a final hearing date signals the watchdog is hardening its stance.

“Apple has the opportunity right now to submit its financials supported by an auditor’s certificate and then argue ​on the quantum of penalty during ​the hearing based on these ⁠financials,” said Gautam Shahi, an antitrust partner at Dua Associates.

“In case it fails, its arguments on quantum of penalty will be constrained accordingly.”

The Apple case started way back in 2021 ​after a non-profit group opposed Apple’s practices.

Later, Tinder-owner Match and Indian startups also ​opposed Apple.

CCI investigators ⁠issued a report in 2024 that Apple exploited its dominant position in the apps market by forcing developers to use its proprietary in-app purchase system.

Apple denies wrongdoing by arguing it is a small player in India, where phones that use Google’s Android system ⁠are ​dominant.

In its April 8 order, the watchdog also noted Apple requested the CCI ​in March to put its proceedings “in abeyance” while the Delhi High Court hears its challenge to the penalty law.

The CCI rejected that demand. The watchdog has ​maintained that Apple is trying to stall the antitrust case by challenging the penalty law.