<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Pakistan</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 22:52:42 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 22:52:42 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>LHC suspends Punjab property protection ordinance</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330449797/lhc-suspends-punjab-property-protection-ordinance</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Lahore High Court on Monday temporarily suspended the operation of the recently-enacted “Punjab Protection of Ownership of Immovable Property Ordinance 2025“ while hearing petitions challenging the law.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chief Justice of Lahore High Court, Justice Aalia Neelum, presided over the hearing of petitions filed by Abida Parveen and other applicants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The court recommended the formation of a full bench and ordered the immediate restoration of all properties taken under the ordinance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During Monday’s hearing, the Punjab chief secretary appeared before the court, drawing strong criticism from the chief justice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The chief justice warned that if the law remained in effect, even high-profile properties like Jati Umra (the Sharif family’s residence) could be vacated within half an hour.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The court questioned why the advocate-general of Punjab had not appeared. The court was told that he was unwell.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Expressing frustration, the chief justice noted that she, too, was unwell but was present in court.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Justice Neelum criticised the law for undermining citizens’ fundamental rights and the supremacy of the judiciary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She questioned how a revenue officer could facilitate property takeovers in matters already pending in civil courts and asked what purpose the law truly served.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“The law allows a phone call to demand property surrender, and citizens have no protection under it,” the chief justice said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Declaring the ordinance against civil rights, constitutional protections, and judicial authority, the court ordered a suspension of its enforcement until the next hearing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The law, approved on October 31, 2025, called for the resolution of property disputes within 90 days.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under the law, each district will have dispute resolution committees headed by deputy commissioners, including DPOs and other relevant officials.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Appeals against the committees’ decisions will be heard by a special tribunal led by a retired High Court judge, also mandated to deliver judgments within 90 days.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The committees are expected to become operational within 30 days to provide citizens with swift justice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Lahore High Court on Monday temporarily suspended the operation of the recently-enacted “Punjab Protection of Ownership of Immovable Property Ordinance 2025“ while hearing petitions challenging the law.</strong></p>
<p>Chief Justice of Lahore High Court, Justice Aalia Neelum, presided over the hearing of petitions filed by Abida Parveen and other applicants.</p>
<p>The court recommended the formation of a full bench and ordered the immediate restoration of all properties taken under the ordinance.</p>
<p>During Monday’s hearing, the Punjab chief secretary appeared before the court, drawing strong criticism from the chief justice.</p>
<p>The chief justice warned that if the law remained in effect, even high-profile properties like Jati Umra (the Sharif family’s residence) could be vacated within half an hour.</p>
<p>The court questioned why the advocate-general of Punjab had not appeared. The court was told that he was unwell.</p>
<p>Expressing frustration, the chief justice noted that she, too, was unwell but was present in court.</p>
<p>Justice Neelum criticised the law for undermining citizens’ fundamental rights and the supremacy of the judiciary.</p>
<p>She questioned how a revenue officer could facilitate property takeovers in matters already pending in civil courts and asked what purpose the law truly served.</p>
<p>“The law allows a phone call to demand property surrender, and citizens have no protection under it,” the chief justice said.</p>
<p>Declaring the ordinance against civil rights, constitutional protections, and judicial authority, the court ordered a suspension of its enforcement until the next hearing.</p>
<p>The law, approved on October 31, 2025, called for the resolution of property disputes within 90 days.</p>
<p>Under the law, each district will have dispute resolution committees headed by deputy commissioners, including DPOs and other relevant officials.</p>
<p>Appeals against the committees’ decisions will be heard by a special tribunal led by a retired High Court judge, also mandated to deliver judgments within 90 days.</p>
<p>The committees are expected to become operational within 30 days to provide citizens with swift justice.</p>
<br>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Pakistan</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330449797</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 13:08:42 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Web Desk)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2025/12/2213074221495b7.webp" type="image/webp" medium="image" height="174" width="290">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2025/12/2213074221495b7.webp"/>
        <media:title>File photo
</media:title>
      </media:content>
      <media:content url="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bdcqk6vyg3w/maxresdefault.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="video" height="480" width="640">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bdcqk6vyg3w/mqdefault.jpg"/>
        <media:player url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdcqk6vyg3w"/>
        <media:title>Punjab Property Ownership Ordinance Case | Supreme Court Orders Reversal of Possessions - Aaj News
</media:title>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
