<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - World</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 02:23:38 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 02:23:38 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>Study challenges theory that Indigenous Australians hunted megafauna</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330441671/study-challenges-theory-that-indigenous-australians-hunted-megafauna</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A new study has overturned the long-held belief that Indigenous Australians hunted the continent’s giant animals to extinction.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead, researchers suggest that Australia’s First Peoples may have valued fossils of these creatures and collected them as cultural or symbolic objects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The findings, published in the journal Royal Society Open Science, are based on a fresh analysis of two fossils from Australia, a kangaroo tibia and a giant wombat tooth, both estimated to be around 50,000 years old.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For decades, scientists believed that cut marks on the kangaroo bone found at Mammoth Cave in southwestern Australia were evidence that early humans butchered large animals for food.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But new scanning techniques reveal that the marks were made long after the animal had died, possibly even after the bone had fossilised.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to lead researcher Dr Michael Archer from the University of New South Wales, this means the bone was not part of a hunting activity, but rather a fossil collected by early Australians as a curiosity or an object of significance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second fossil examined, a premolar from the extinct giant wombat Zygomaturus trilobus, was also found to have been used as a charm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was mounted in resin and tied with a human hair string, suggesting that it was traded and valued for its cultural meaning rather than its practical use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dr Archer said the evidence challenges the long-standing “overkill” hypothesis that humans rapidly hunted megafauna to extinction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“The findings show that people and these large animals coexisted for thousands of years, and their disappearance was more likely linked to climate change than to human hunting,” he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other experts agree that the results reflect what is already known about early human behaviour.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Archaeologist Dr Judith Field, who was not part of the study, noted that ancient Australians were known to use bones and shells as ornaments or ceremonial items.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new interpretation adds a fresh perspective to Australia’s prehistoric record, portraying its First Peoples not as over-hunters, but as observant collectors and custodians of their natural environment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>A new study has overturned the long-held belief that Indigenous Australians hunted the continent’s giant animals to extinction.</strong></p>
<p>Instead, researchers suggest that Australia’s First Peoples may have valued fossils of these creatures and collected them as cultural or symbolic objects.</p>
<p>The findings, published in the journal Royal Society Open Science, are based on a fresh analysis of two fossils from Australia, a kangaroo tibia and a giant wombat tooth, both estimated to be around 50,000 years old.</p>
<p>For decades, scientists believed that cut marks on the kangaroo bone found at Mammoth Cave in southwestern Australia were evidence that early humans butchered large animals for food.</p>
<p>But new scanning techniques reveal that the marks were made long after the animal had died, possibly even after the bone had fossilised.</p>
<p>According to lead researcher Dr Michael Archer from the University of New South Wales, this means the bone was not part of a hunting activity, but rather a fossil collected by early Australians as a curiosity or an object of significance.</p>
<p>The second fossil examined, a premolar from the extinct giant wombat Zygomaturus trilobus, was also found to have been used as a charm.</p>
<p>It was mounted in resin and tied with a human hair string, suggesting that it was traded and valued for its cultural meaning rather than its practical use.</p>
<p>Dr Archer said the evidence challenges the long-standing “overkill” hypothesis that humans rapidly hunted megafauna to extinction.</p>
<p>“The findings show that people and these large animals coexisted for thousands of years, and their disappearance was more likely linked to climate change than to human hunting,” he said.</p>
<p>Other experts agree that the results reflect what is already known about early human behaviour.</p>
<p>Archaeologist Dr Judith Field, who was not part of the study, noted that ancient Australians were known to use bones and shells as ornaments or ceremonial items.</p>
<p>The new interpretation adds a fresh perspective to Australia’s prehistoric record, portraying its First Peoples not as over-hunters, but as observant collectors and custodians of their natural environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>World</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330441671</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 13:57:29 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Web Desk)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2025/10/281340567b24524.webp" type="image/webp" medium="image" height="480" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2025/10/281340567b24524.webp"/>
        <media:title/>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
