<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Pakistan</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 12:41:09 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 12:41:09 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>Islamabad High Court acquits four PTI workers in May 9 case</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330422657/islamabad-high-court-acquits-four-pti-workers-in-may-9-case</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In a significant relief for the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday acquitted four party workers convicted in a May 9 violence case, overturning their 10-year prison sentences.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A two-member bench comprising Justice Azam Khan and Justice Khadam Hussain Soomro announced the verdict after hearing arguments from both sides.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The court declared the earlier convictions null and void due to insufficient evidence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The four acquitted individuals — Sohail, Shahzaib, Mera Khan, and Ikram Khan — were among 11 convicted by an anti-terrorism court (ATC) on May 30 in a case related to violent protests following the arrest of PTI founder Imran Khan. PTI MNA Abdul Latif was also among those sentenced.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senior lawyer Babar Awan, representing the defence, told the court that of the nine prosecution witnesses, only one — Assistant Sub-Inspector Muhammad Sharif — had identified the accused.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He argued that while the accused were charged with opening fire, no injuries were reported.
“If there’s a crime, punishment is necessary — but the legal system shouldn’t be turned into a joke,” Awan said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Justice Soomro asked the prosecution whether any concrete proof against the accused existed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The prosecutor requested more time to present evidence, but the bench noted that all arguments had already been heard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“There’s no medico-legal certificate, no injured person, and witnesses did not confirm the accused were present at the scene,” the court observed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Should the court award punishment solely based on an identification parade?” Justice Soomro questioned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The prosecutor insisted that attacking a police station was an act of terrorism, but the court remained unconvinced and delivered the verdict in favour of the appellants, acquitting them of all charges.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>In a significant relief for the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday acquitted four party workers convicted in a May 9 violence case, overturning their 10-year prison sentences.</strong></p>
<p>A two-member bench comprising Justice Azam Khan and Justice Khadam Hussain Soomro announced the verdict after hearing arguments from both sides.</p>
<p>The court declared the earlier convictions null and void due to insufficient evidence.</p>
<p>The four acquitted individuals — Sohail, Shahzaib, Mera Khan, and Ikram Khan — were among 11 convicted by an anti-terrorism court (ATC) on May 30 in a case related to violent protests following the arrest of PTI founder Imran Khan. PTI MNA Abdul Latif was also among those sentenced.</p>
<p>Senior lawyer Babar Awan, representing the defence, told the court that of the nine prosecution witnesses, only one — Assistant Sub-Inspector Muhammad Sharif — had identified the accused.</p>
<p>He argued that while the accused were charged with opening fire, no injuries were reported.
“If there’s a crime, punishment is necessary — but the legal system shouldn’t be turned into a joke,” Awan said.</p>
<p>Justice Soomro asked the prosecution whether any concrete proof against the accused existed.</p>
<p>The prosecutor requested more time to present evidence, but the bench noted that all arguments had already been heard.</p>
<p>“There’s no medico-legal certificate, no injured person, and witnesses did not confirm the accused were present at the scene,” the court observed.</p>
<p>“Should the court award punishment solely based on an identification parade?” Justice Soomro questioned.</p>
<p>The prosecutor insisted that attacking a police station was an act of terrorism, but the court remained unconvinced and delivered the verdict in favour of the appellants, acquitting them of all charges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Pakistan</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330422657</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 17:27:42 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Asif Naveed)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2025/07/03172603e1f820b.jpg?r=172733" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" height="480" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2025/07/03172603e1f820b.jpg?r=172733"/>
        <media:title/>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
