<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Pakistan</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 06:49:00 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 06:49:00 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>No reserved seats for PTI as SC overturns July 12 decision</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330421596/no-reserved-seats-for-pti-as-sc-overturns-july-12-decision</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Supreme Court’s constitutional bench on Friday has accepted the review petitions regarding reserved seats, nullifying the earlier verdict that had favoured Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While upholding the decision of the Peshawar High Court, the apex court, by a majority decision of seven judges, declared the July 12 ruling—which had ordered the allocation of reserved seats to PTI—as void.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With this decision, PTI stands deprived of 22 National Assembly and 55 Provincial Assembly reserved seats, which will now be allocated to parties within the ruling coalition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A 10-member constitutional bench, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, heard the case. During the proceedings, prominent lawyer Makhdoom Ali Khan presented arguments on behalf of the petitioners.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The majority verdict was delivered by Justice Aminuddin Khan, Justice Musarrat Hilali, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, Justice Shahid Bilal, Justice Hashim Kakar, Justice Aamer Farooq, and Justice Ali Baqar Najafi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Justice Salahuddin Panhwar recused himself from the bench, while Justice Ayesha Malik and Justice Aqeel Abbasi had dismissed the review petitions during the preliminary hearings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On March 4, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) rejected requests to allot reserved seats for women and minorities to the Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC)—the party to which PTI-backed independents had joined post-elections. The ECP, in a 4-1 majority verdict issued on March 1, ruled that the SIC had failed to comply with legal requirements, including submission of party lists, and thus was ineligible for reserved seats.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;he ECP further stated that the vacant reserved seats would not remain unfilled and should instead be redistributed among other parliamentary parties based on proportional representation. As a result, the ECP reallocated these seats to parties including PML-N, PPP, MQM-P, and JUI-F.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chief Election Commissioner Sikandar Sultan Raja and three other members endorsed the majority decision, while Punjab Member Babar Bharwana dissented.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On May 3, the Supreme Court took up the case after earlier suspending both the ECP’s March 1 ruling and the PHC’s March 14 judgment, referring the matter to a larger bench. PTI had challenged the ECP’s decision as “unconstitutional,” arguing it was wrongly denied its share of reserved seats.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today’s Supreme Court ruling concludes the legal dispute, reaffirming that the Sunni Ittehad Council is not entitled to reserved seats and validating the redistribution of those seats to other parties.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Supreme Court’s constitutional bench on Friday has accepted the review petitions regarding reserved seats, nullifying the earlier verdict that had favoured Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).</strong></p>
<p>While upholding the decision of the Peshawar High Court, the apex court, by a majority decision of seven judges, declared the July 12 ruling—which had ordered the allocation of reserved seats to PTI—as void.</p>
<p>With this decision, PTI stands deprived of 22 National Assembly and 55 Provincial Assembly reserved seats, which will now be allocated to parties within the ruling coalition.</p>
<p>A 10-member constitutional bench, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, heard the case. During the proceedings, prominent lawyer Makhdoom Ali Khan presented arguments on behalf of the petitioners.</p>
<p>The majority verdict was delivered by Justice Aminuddin Khan, Justice Musarrat Hilali, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, Justice Shahid Bilal, Justice Hashim Kakar, Justice Aamer Farooq, and Justice Ali Baqar Najafi.</p>
<p>Justice Salahuddin Panhwar recused himself from the bench, while Justice Ayesha Malik and Justice Aqeel Abbasi had dismissed the review petitions during the preliminary hearings.</p>
<p>On March 4, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) rejected requests to allot reserved seats for women and minorities to the Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC)—the party to which PTI-backed independents had joined post-elections. The ECP, in a 4-1 majority verdict issued on March 1, ruled that the SIC had failed to comply with legal requirements, including submission of party lists, and thus was ineligible for reserved seats.</p>
<p>he ECP further stated that the vacant reserved seats would not remain unfilled and should instead be redistributed among other parliamentary parties based on proportional representation. As a result, the ECP reallocated these seats to parties including PML-N, PPP, MQM-P, and JUI-F.</p>
<p>Chief Election Commissioner Sikandar Sultan Raja and three other members endorsed the majority decision, while Punjab Member Babar Bharwana dissented.</p>
<p>On May 3, the Supreme Court took up the case after earlier suspending both the ECP’s March 1 ruling and the PHC’s March 14 judgment, referring the matter to a larger bench. PTI had challenged the ECP’s decision as “unconstitutional,” arguing it was wrongly denied its share of reserved seats.</p>
<p>Today’s Supreme Court ruling concludes the legal dispute, reaffirming that the Sunni Ittehad Council is not entitled to reserved seats and validating the redistribution of those seats to other parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Pakistan</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330421596</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:32:57 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Afzal Javed)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2025/06/27192309b77e68c.jpg?r=192317" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" height="480" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2025/06/27192309b77e68c.jpg?r=192317"/>
        <media:title>File photo
</media:title>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
