<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - World</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 04:42:34 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 04:42:34 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>Trump disavows spy chief Gabbard’s take on Iran’s nuclear programme</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330420592/trump-disavows-spy-chief-gabbards-take-on-irans-nuclear-programme</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Trump contested intelligence assessments relayed earlier this year by his spy chief that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon when he spoke with reporters at an airport in Morristown, New Jersey.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In March, Gabbard testified to Congress that the US intelligence community continued to believe that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“The (intelligence community) continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon,” she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Friday, Gabbard said in a post on the social media platform X that: “America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can’t happen, and I agree.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She said the media has taken her March testimony “out of context” and was trying to “manufacture division.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters the March assessment presented by Gabbard has not changed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The source said US spy services judged it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David Albright, a former UN nuclear inspector, questioned the revised view offered by Gabbard on Friday, estimating it would take Iran at least six months to produce a crude nuclear “device” that could not be delivered by a missile.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To produce a nuclear weapon that could be delivered on target by missile would take Iran at least one to two years, said Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon.</strong></p>
<p>Trump contested intelligence assessments relayed earlier this year by his spy chief that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon when he spoke with reporters at an airport in Morristown, New Jersey.</p>
<p>In March, Gabbard testified to Congress that the US intelligence community continued to believe that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon.</p>
<p>“The (intelligence community) continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon,” she said.</p>
<p>On Friday, Gabbard said in a post on the social media platform X that: “America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can’t happen, and I agree.”</p>
<p>She said the media has taken her March testimony “out of context” and was trying to “manufacture division.”</p>
<p>A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters the March assessment presented by Gabbard has not changed.</p>
<p>The source said US spy services judged it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice.</p>
<p>David Albright, a former UN nuclear inspector, questioned the revised view offered by Gabbard on Friday, estimating it would take Iran at least six months to produce a crude nuclear “device” that could not be delivered by a missile.</p>
<p>To produce a nuclear weapon that could be delivered on target by missile would take Iran at least one to two years, said Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>World</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330420592</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2025 16:31:10 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Reuters)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2025/06/211623451f8d7ab.jpg?r=162746" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" height="480" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2025/06/211623451f8d7ab.jpg?r=162746"/>
        <media:title>Tulsi Gabbard. – Reuters file
</media:title>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
