Speaking on Aaj TV’s programme “Spotlight” with host Munizae Jahangir, he emphasised that canal construction in the 21st century requires reconsideration, as the uneven terrain of Cholistan makes an irrigation system impractical.

Dr Abbas highlighted that the British had constructed canals only in naturally levelled areas, whereas Cholistan lacks such topography.

He further pointed out that while the region has small underground freshwater reserves, the majority of its water is saline and unsuitable for agriculture.

Also, read this

IRSA approves water supply for Cholistan project

IRSA releases 281,500 cusecs of water from Indus river system

Ten times heavier rainfall drove vast Pakistan flooding: ESA

“The irrigation system cannot function in Cholistan. Canal water won’t work with modern systems unless massive water reservoirs are built, which would require enormous costs,” he explained.

He also cited India’s failed attempt to cultivate Rajasthan as a cautionary example.

Meanwhile, Pakistan Muslim League-N (PML-N) Senator Khalil Tahir Sindhu defended the canal project, claiming it would cultivate 3.5 million acres of land in Cholistan and significantly benefit the common man.

He dismissed the opposition’s objections as politically motivated and assured that federal authorities had guaranteed that Sindh’s water share would remain unaffected.

Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Senator Zamir Ghumro, however, opposed the plan, arguing that the Indus River lacks sufficient water to support six new canals. He reiterated Sindh’s concerns over water distribution and called for federal intervention.

PPP leadership has taken a firm stance, with Chairman Bilawal Bhutto warning that any unconstitutional action regarding Sindh’s water rights could force the party to reconsider its alliance with the government. “Our system does not have enough water for new canals,” Ghumro asserted.