<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Pakistan</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 11:57:37 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 11:57:37 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>Akhtar Hussain: Unable to continue due to dispute over recent judicial appointments</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330404509/akhtar-hussain-unable-to-continue-due-to-dispute-over-recent-judicial-appointments</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Senior lawyer Akhtar Hussain said that due to the ongoing controversy over recent judicial appointments, he had resigned from his position as a member of Pakistan’s Judicial Commission.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Speaking on &lt;em&gt;Aaj News’&lt;/em&gt; programme “Spotlight”, hosted by Munizae Jahangir, Hussain said that despite years of efforts to amend the commission’s rules, meaningful reforms were never implemented.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“We tried for four to five years to amend the Judicial Commission’s rules, eliminate discrimination, and enforce the principle of seniority,” Hussain said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    &lt;figure class='media  sm:w-1/3  w-full  media--right  media--embed  '&gt;
        &lt;div class='media__item  media__item--youtube  '&gt;&lt;iframe src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/HJh-ycMw0T0?enablejsapi=1&amp;controls=1&amp;modestbranding=1&amp;rel=0' loading='lazy' allowfullscreen='' frameborder='0' scrolling='no' width='100%' height='100%'&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
        
    &lt;/figure&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He added that the Pakistan Bar Council had repeatedly nominated him unopposed, reflecting a consensus among legal representatives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a id="resistance-to-reforms-and-judicial-dominance" href="#resistance-to-reforms-and-judicial-dominance" class="heading-permalink" aria-hidden="true" title="Permalink"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Resistance to reforms and judicial dominance&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hussain highlighted that judicial members of the commission consistently resisted changes, making meaningful consultation with bar representatives difficult.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Judges had a majority in decision-making, leaving legal representatives with little influence,” he explained.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite continuous lobbying for parliamentary oversight and structural changes, the commission remained unyielding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He also pointed out that previous chief justices were unwilling to address the perceived discrimination in judicial appointments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Also, read this&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://english.aaj.tv/news/330402077/jcp-seeks-names-for-appointment-of-four-additional-judges-in-lahore-high-court"&gt;JCP seeks names for appointment of four additional judges in Lahore High Court&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://english.aaj.tv/news/330400785/judicial-commission-of-pakistan-recommends-10-additional-judges-for-peshawar-high-court"&gt;Judicial Commission of Pakistan recommends 10 additional judges for Peshawar High Court&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://english.aaj.tv/news/330401538/jcp-approves-appointment-of-9-judges-to-lhc"&gt;JCP approves appointment of 9 judges to LHC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Through their judgments, they rendered the parliamentary committee ineffective, leading to demands for constitutional amendments and the establishment of a federal constitutional court,” Hussain stated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a id="concerns-over-26th-amendment" href="#concerns-over-26th-amendment" class="heading-permalink" aria-hidden="true" title="Permalink"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Concerns over 26th Amendment&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenting on the impact of the 26th Amendment, Hussain warned that if non-judicial members in the newly constituted commission made decisions based solely on majority votes, it could further destabilise the system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“This would raise serious questions about the credibility of the process,” he noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hussain formally submitted his resignation to Judicial Commission Chairman Justice Yahya Afridi, stating, “I can no longer continue under these circumstances.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He emphasised his commitment to judicial independence and reform, thanking the Pakistan Bar Council for its support.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite stepping down, Hussain vowed to continue working towards judicial integrity and institutional reforms, underscoring the need for a transparent and merit-based system in Pakistan’s judiciary.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>Senior lawyer Akhtar Hussain said that due to the ongoing controversy over recent judicial appointments, he had resigned from his position as a member of Pakistan’s Judicial Commission.</strong></p>
<p>Speaking on <em>Aaj News’</em> programme “Spotlight”, hosted by Munizae Jahangir, Hussain said that despite years of efforts to amend the commission’s rules, meaningful reforms were never implemented.</p>
<p>“We tried for four to five years to amend the Judicial Commission’s rules, eliminate discrimination, and enforce the principle of seniority,” Hussain said.</p>
<p>    <figure class='media  sm:w-1/3  w-full  media--right  media--embed  '>
        <div class='media__item  media__item--youtube  '><iframe src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/HJh-ycMw0T0?enablejsapi=1&controls=1&modestbranding=1&rel=0' loading='lazy' allowfullscreen='' frameborder='0' scrolling='no' width='100%' height='100%'></iframe></div>
        
    </figure></p>
<p>He added that the Pakistan Bar Council had repeatedly nominated him unopposed, reflecting a consensus among legal representatives.</p>
<h2><a id="resistance-to-reforms-and-judicial-dominance" href="#resistance-to-reforms-and-judicial-dominance" class="heading-permalink" aria-hidden="true" title="Permalink"></a>Resistance to reforms and judicial dominance</h2>
<p>Hussain highlighted that judicial members of the commission consistently resisted changes, making meaningful consultation with bar representatives difficult.</p>
<p>“Judges had a majority in decision-making, leaving legal representatives with little influence,” he explained.</p>
<p>Despite continuous lobbying for parliamentary oversight and structural changes, the commission remained unyielding.</p>
<p>He also pointed out that previous chief justices were unwilling to address the perceived discrimination in judicial appointments.</p>
<p><strong>Also, read this</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://english.aaj.tv/news/330402077/jcp-seeks-names-for-appointment-of-four-additional-judges-in-lahore-high-court">JCP seeks names for appointment of four additional judges in Lahore High Court</a></p>
<p><a href="https://english.aaj.tv/news/330400785/judicial-commission-of-pakistan-recommends-10-additional-judges-for-peshawar-high-court">Judicial Commission of Pakistan recommends 10 additional judges for Peshawar High Court</a></p>
<p><a href="https://english.aaj.tv/news/330401538/jcp-approves-appointment-of-9-judges-to-lhc">JCP approves appointment of 9 judges to LHC</a></p>
<p>“Through their judgments, they rendered the parliamentary committee ineffective, leading to demands for constitutional amendments and the establishment of a federal constitutional court,” Hussain stated.</p>
<h2><a id="concerns-over-26th-amendment" href="#concerns-over-26th-amendment" class="heading-permalink" aria-hidden="true" title="Permalink"></a>Concerns over 26th Amendment</h2>
<p>Commenting on the impact of the 26th Amendment, Hussain warned that if non-judicial members in the newly constituted commission made decisions based solely on majority votes, it could further destabilise the system.</p>
<p>“This would raise serious questions about the credibility of the process,” he noted.</p>
<p>Hussain formally submitted his resignation to Judicial Commission Chairman Justice Yahya Afridi, stating, “I can no longer continue under these circumstances.”</p>
<p>He emphasised his commitment to judicial independence and reform, thanking the Pakistan Bar Council for its support.</p>
<p>Despite stepping down, Hussain vowed to continue working towards judicial integrity and institutional reforms, underscoring the need for a transparent and merit-based system in Pakistan’s judiciary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Pakistan</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330404509</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:20:17 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Web Desk)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2025/02/242215435453217.jpg?r=221640" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" height="480" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2025/02/242215435453217.jpg?r=221640"/>
        <media:title>Senior lawyer Akhtar Hussain. TV grab
</media:title>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
