<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - World</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 11:56:53 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 11:56:53 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>CIA says Covid ‘more likely’ to have leaked from lab</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330399841/cia-says-covid-more-likely-to-have-leaked-from-lab</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Central Intelligence Agency has shifted its official stance on the origin of Covid-19, saying Saturday that the virus was “more likely” leaked from a Chinese lab than transmitted by animals.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new assessment came after John Ratcliffe was confirmed Thursday as the CIA director under the second White House administration of Donald Trump.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ratcliffe, who served as the director of national intelligence from 2020-2021 during Trump’s first term, said in an interview published Friday that a “day-one” priority would be making an assessment on Covid’s origins.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“The agency is going to get off the sidelines,” Ratcliffe – who believes Covid-19 leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology – told right-wing outlet Breitbart.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“CIA assesses with low confidence that a research-related origin of the COVID-19 pandemic is more likely than a natural origin based on the available body of reporting,” a CIA spokesperson said in a statement Saturday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The agency had not previously made any determination on whether Covid had been unleashed by a laboratory mishap or spilled over from animals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“CIA continues to assess that both research-related and natural origin scenarios of the COVID-19 pandemic remain plausible,” the spokesperson noted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A US official told AFP the shift was based on a new analysis of existing intelligence ordered by previous CIA director William Burns, which was completed before Ratcliffe’s arrival this week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some US agencies, like the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Energy, support the lab-leak theory, albeit with varying levels of confidence, while most elements of the intelligence community lean toward natural origins.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proponents of the lab-leak hypothesis highlight that the earliest known Covid-19 cases emerged in Wuhan, China – a major coronavirus research hub – roughly 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers) from the nearest bat populations carrying similar SARS-like viruses.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Central Intelligence Agency has shifted its official stance on the origin of Covid-19, saying Saturday that the virus was “more likely” leaked from a Chinese lab than transmitted by animals.</strong></p>
<p>The new assessment came after John Ratcliffe was confirmed Thursday as the CIA director under the second White House administration of Donald Trump.</p>
<p>Ratcliffe, who served as the director of national intelligence from 2020-2021 during Trump’s first term, said in an interview published Friday that a “day-one” priority would be making an assessment on Covid’s origins.</p>
<p>“The agency is going to get off the sidelines,” Ratcliffe – who believes Covid-19 leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology – told right-wing outlet Breitbart.</p>
<p>“CIA assesses with low confidence that a research-related origin of the COVID-19 pandemic is more likely than a natural origin based on the available body of reporting,” a CIA spokesperson said in a statement Saturday.</p>
<p>The agency had not previously made any determination on whether Covid had been unleashed by a laboratory mishap or spilled over from animals.</p>
<p>“CIA continues to assess that both research-related and natural origin scenarios of the COVID-19 pandemic remain plausible,” the spokesperson noted.</p>
<p>A US official told AFP the shift was based on a new analysis of existing intelligence ordered by previous CIA director William Burns, which was completed before Ratcliffe’s arrival this week.</p>
<p>Some US agencies, like the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Energy, support the lab-leak theory, albeit with varying levels of confidence, while most elements of the intelligence community lean toward natural origins.</p>
<p>Proponents of the lab-leak hypothesis highlight that the earliest known Covid-19 cases emerged in Wuhan, China – a major coronavirus research hub – roughly 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers) from the nearest bat populations carrying similar SARS-like viruses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>World</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330399841</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 11:31:35 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (AFP)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2025/01/26113117b765584.webp?r=113135" type="image/webp" medium="image" height="720" width="1200">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2025/01/26113117b765584.webp?r=113135"/>
        <media:title/>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
