<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Pakistan</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 05:15:41 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 05:15:41 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>Justice Naeem Afghan added to Article 63-A case bench</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330381999/justice-naeem-afghan-added-to-article-63-a-case-bench</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A meeting of the Supreme Court’s Practice and Procedure Judges Committee ran into a hurdle on Tuesday after Justice Mansoor Ali Shah did not attend.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Justice Aminuddin Khan waited for the senior pusine judge for a siginificant time, according to sources.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The committee had met to reconstitute a bench to hear the appeals against Article 63-A of the constitution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CJP Isa proposed Justice Mansoor Ali Shah’s name for the bench in place of Justice Munib Akhtar, who had announced that he would not sit on the bench.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, since Justice Mansoor did not attend the meeting, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan was added to the bench.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As soon as the hearing began, PTI’s lawyer Ali Zafar raise dobjections to the composition of the bench. However, the CJP told him his objections would be heard later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    &lt;figure class='media  sm:w-1/3  w-full  media--right  media--embed  media--uneven'&gt;
        &lt;div class='media__item  media__item--newskitlink  '&gt;    &lt;iframe
        class="nk-iframe" 
        width="100%" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="height:250px;position:relative"
        src="https://english.aaj.tv/news/card/330381964"
        sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
        
    &lt;/figure&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CJP Isa then recounted the whole matter from Justice Mnuib’s refusal, to a new committee meeting where the decision to add Justice Afghan to the bench was taken.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Justice Isa said that he was left with no choice but to nominate the new judge. He also said that what was happening in the court was open to the entire world and was not happening behind closed doors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He also added that the  minutes of the meeting where the decision had been taken had been uploaded on the SC website.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>A meeting of the Supreme Court’s Practice and Procedure Judges Committee ran into a hurdle on Tuesday after Justice Mansoor Ali Shah did not attend.</strong></p>
<p>Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Justice Aminuddin Khan waited for the senior pusine judge for a siginificant time, according to sources.</p>
<p>The committee had met to reconstitute a bench to hear the appeals against Article 63-A of the constitution.</p>
<p>CJP Isa proposed Justice Mansoor Ali Shah’s name for the bench in place of Justice Munib Akhtar, who had announced that he would not sit on the bench.</p>
<p>However, since Justice Mansoor did not attend the meeting, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan was added to the bench.</p>
<p>As soon as the hearing began, PTI’s lawyer Ali Zafar raise dobjections to the composition of the bench. However, the CJP told him his objections would be heard later.</p>
<p>    <figure class='media  sm:w-1/3  w-full  media--right  media--embed  media--uneven'>
        <div class='media__item  media__item--newskitlink  '>    <iframe
        class="nk-iframe" 
        width="100%" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="height:250px;position:relative"
        src="https://english.aaj.tv/news/card/330381964"
        sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms"></iframe></div>
        
    </figure></p>
<p>CJP Isa then recounted the whole matter from Justice Mnuib’s refusal, to a new committee meeting where the decision to add Justice Afghan to the bench was taken.</p>
<p>Justice Isa said that he was left with no choice but to nominate the new judge. He also said that what was happening in the court was open to the entire world and was not happening behind closed doors.</p>
<p>He also added that the  minutes of the meeting where the decision had been taken had been uploaded on the SC website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Pakistan</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330381999</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 13:13:31 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Web Desk)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2024/10/01130641cc4d1c7.jpg?r=130927" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" height="480" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2024/10/01130641cc4d1c7.jpg?r=130927"/>
        <media:title/>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
