The court has also barred the High Court from further proceedings in the matter and suspended the order against surveillance in the country. The bench remarked that the order to stop surveillance was only effective for one hearing.

Justice Aminuddin, during the hearing, remarked, “It is possible that the people involved in the audio recordings themselves leaked them. Has this aspect been considered? Every mobile phone nowadays has a recording system.”

A two-member bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justice Aminuddin and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, heard the federal government’s petition regarding the audio leaks.

During the hearing, the Supreme Court stated that the Islamabad High Court cannot proceed with the audio leaks case. It deemed the High Court’s orders of May 29 and June 25 as exceeding its powers, stating that the High Court does not have the authority to take suo motu notice.

The Supreme Court, upon the federal government’s request, summoned the record of the audio leaks case and issued notices to Bushra Bibi and Najam Saqib.

Read more:

IHC order on audio leaks mentions Aaj News English story

PEMRA urges Justice Sattar to recuse himself from Bushra Bibi audio leak case

Audio leaks case: IHC seeks report from govt within six weeks

Justice Aminuddin Khan inquired whether the High Court had determined who recorded the audio. The Additional Attorney General responded that this has not yet been established and the investigation is ongoing.

Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan lamented, “Unfortunately, in this country, no one wants to reach the truth. To uncover the truth, an inquiry commission was formed and handed over to the Supreme Court, but the audio leaks case has not been scheduled again in the Supreme Court.”

“When the Parliament attempted to seek the truth, it was also stopped. Neither Parliament nor the courts are allowed to function, then how will the truth come to light?”