<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Pakistan</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:54:59 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:54:59 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>Fact Check: IHC judges did not file petition against ISI chief</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330368551/fact-check-ihc-judges-did-not-file-petition-against-isi-chief</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has refuted the claim that one of its judges, Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, has filed a petition against the head of an intelligence agency.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On March 25, 2023, six out of the eight judges of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) wrote a letter to the Supreme Judicial Council members, Dawn News reported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this letter, they raised concerns about attempts to pressure judges through the abduction and torture of their relatives, as well as the secret surveillance of their homes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On July 3, 2023, Fauzia Siddiqui, a member of the provincial assembly (MPA) from the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, claimed in a tweet that Justice Aurangzeb had filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the head of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Siddiqui alleged that the intelligence agencies had threatened the families of the judges.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Siddiqui’s tweet was viewed by over 100,000 social media users and was retweeted by several PTI supporters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the IHC has categorically refuted these claims, stating in a press release that the contents of the tweet and other social media posts are “not true” and “baseless”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The high court responded to a query by iverify a factcheck project of CEJ.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote class="blockquote-level-1"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://english.aaj.tv/news/330361650/in-another-letter-justice-sattar-raises-allegations-of-judicial-interference"&gt;In another letter, Justice Sattar raises allegations of judicial interference&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote class="blockquote-level-1"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://english.aaj.tv/news/330361633/ihc-to-take-up-contempt-cases-on-complaints-of-judges"&gt;IHC to take up contempt cases on complaints of judges&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote class="blockquote-level-1"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://english.aaj.tv/news/330360768/sc-resumes-suo-motu-hearing-on-judicial-meddling"&gt;SC resumes suo motu hearing on judicial meddling &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has refuted the claim that one of its judges, Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, has filed a petition against the head of an intelligence agency.</strong></p>
<p>On March 25, 2023, six out of the eight judges of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) wrote a letter to the Supreme Judicial Council members, Dawn News reported.</p>
<p>In this letter, they raised concerns about attempts to pressure judges through the abduction and torture of their relatives, as well as the secret surveillance of their homes.</p>
<p>On July 3, 2023, Fauzia Siddiqui, a member of the provincial assembly (MPA) from the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, claimed in a tweet that Justice Aurangzeb had filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the head of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).</p>
<p>Siddiqui alleged that the intelligence agencies had threatened the families of the judges.</p>
<p>Siddiqui’s tweet was viewed by over 100,000 social media users and was retweeted by several PTI supporters.</p>
<p>However, the IHC has categorically refuted these claims, stating in a press release that the contents of the tweet and other social media posts are “not true” and “baseless”.</p>
<p>The high court responded to a query by iverify a factcheck project of CEJ.</p>
<p><strong>Read more</strong></p>
<blockquote class="blockquote-level-1">
<p><a href="https://english.aaj.tv/news/330361650/in-another-letter-justice-sattar-raises-allegations-of-judicial-interference">In another letter, Justice Sattar raises allegations of judicial interference</a></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="blockquote-level-1">
<p><a href="https://english.aaj.tv/news/330361633/ihc-to-take-up-contempt-cases-on-complaints-of-judges">IHC to take up contempt cases on complaints of judges</a></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="blockquote-level-1">
<p><a href="https://english.aaj.tv/news/330360768/sc-resumes-suo-motu-hearing-on-judicial-meddling">SC resumes suo motu hearing on judicial meddling </a></p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Pakistan</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/330368551</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 12:46:41 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Web Desk)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2024/07/06122930e70208d.jpg?r=122947" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" height="400" width="700">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2024/07/06122930e70208d.jpg?r=122947"/>
        <media:title>Islamabad High Court. Photo via X
</media:title>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
