<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Pakistan</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 05:17:15 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 05:17:15 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>Nadeem Anjum, not Faiz, involved in VONC, clarifies Maulana</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/30351355/nadeem-anjum-not-faiz-involved-in-vonc-clarifies-maulana</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maulana Fazal ur Rehman has clarified that Lt General Nadeem Anjum, not Lt General (retired) Faiz Hameed was involved in the vote of no confidence against Imran Khan.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an interview with Gharida Farooqui on Friday, Maulana clarified remarks made in &lt;a href="https://www.aajenglish.tv/news/30351266/maulana-spills-the-beans-on-bajwa-and-faizs-role-in-no-confidence-vote"&gt;another interview&lt;/a&gt; on Thursday, where he had claimed that previous army chief and spymaster had been the force behind the vote that removed Imran from power.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, questions had been raised over the accuracy of Maulana’s facts as Hameed had only been removed from the Inter-Services Intelligence and posted as Corps Commander Peshawar.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Friday’s interview, Maulana said he wanted to clarify that it was not Hameed but the next DG-ISI who was behind the vote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Responding to General Bajwa’s remarks that he could state on oath against Maulana’s version, Fazal said that such an oath would have no meaning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He added that all officers take an oath to stay away from politics but violate it showing there was no respect among generals for oaths.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    &lt;figure class='media  sm:w-1/3  w-full  media--right  media--embed  media--uneven'&gt;
        &lt;div class='media__item  media__item--newskitlink  '&gt;    &lt;iframe
        class="nk-iframe" onload="setInterval(()=&gt;{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+'px';}catch{}}, 100)"
        width="100%" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="height:400px;position:relative"
        src="https://www.aajenglish.tv/news/card/30351321"
        sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
        
    &lt;/figure&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fazal also said that his version was based on ‘facts’ and it was unnecessary to talk about oaths about events that happened infornt of everyone’s eyes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Asked if he wanted the whole matter to be investigated, Maualan wondered who could undertake such an investigation. He said that he had no trust in any institution in Pakistan.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>Maulana Fazal ur Rehman has clarified that Lt General Nadeem Anjum, not Lt General (retired) Faiz Hameed was involved in the vote of no confidence against Imran Khan.</strong></p>
<p>In an interview with Gharida Farooqui on Friday, Maulana clarified remarks made in <a href="https://www.aajenglish.tv/news/30351266/maulana-spills-the-beans-on-bajwa-and-faizs-role-in-no-confidence-vote">another interview</a> on Thursday, where he had claimed that previous army chief and spymaster had been the force behind the vote that removed Imran from power.</p>
<p>However, questions had been raised over the accuracy of Maulana’s facts as Hameed had only been removed from the Inter-Services Intelligence and posted as Corps Commander Peshawar.</p>
<p>In Friday’s interview, Maulana said he wanted to clarify that it was not Hameed but the next DG-ISI who was behind the vote.</p>
<p>Responding to General Bajwa’s remarks that he could state on oath against Maulana’s version, Fazal said that such an oath would have no meaning.</p>
<p>He added that all officers take an oath to stay away from politics but violate it showing there was no respect among generals for oaths.</p>
<p>    <figure class='media  sm:w-1/3  w-full  media--right  media--embed  media--uneven'>
        <div class='media__item  media__item--newskitlink  '>    <iframe
        class="nk-iframe" onload="setInterval(()=>{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+'px';}catch{}}, 100)"
        width="100%" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="height:400px;position:relative"
        src="https://www.aajenglish.tv/news/card/30351321"
        sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms"></iframe></div>
        
    </figure></p>
<p>Fazal also said that his version was based on ‘facts’ and it was unnecessary to talk about oaths about events that happened infornt of everyone’s eyes.</p>
<p>Asked if he wanted the whole matter to be investigated, Maualan wondered who could undertake such an investigation. He said that he had no trust in any institution in Pakistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Pakistan</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/30351355</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:14:19 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Web Desk)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2024/02/161952580ce82db.png?r=195305" type="image/png" medium="image" height="480" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2024/02/161952580ce82db.png?r=195305"/>
        <media:title/>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
