<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Pakistan</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:50:34 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:50:34 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>Court rejects Imran and Qureshi’s bail in cipher case</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/30333666/court-rejects-imran-and-qureshis-bail-in-cipher-case</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A special court in Islamabad rejected bail applications filed by Imran Khan and Shah Mahmood Qureshi in the cipher case on Thursday.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Judge Abu Alhasnaat Zulqurnain announced the reserved the judgement after hearing arguments from both sides in Thursday’s hearing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Asad Umar was granted bail in the same case earlier in the day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The case, registered under the Official Secrets Act, accuses former Prime Minister Khan and former Foreign Minister Qureshi of disclosing the contents of the a diplomatic cipher sent by Pakistan’s ambassador in Washington.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waving a piece of paper in a public rally, Imran had alleged the cipher contained proof of a conspiracy to oust him from power, weeks before his government ended through a no-confidence vote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a id="the-hearing" href="#the-hearing" class="heading-permalink" aria-hidden="true" title="Permalink"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;The hearing&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The judge questioned why the copy of the cipher had gone missing when it was a classified document. He also remarked that the copies of the cipher in possession of the army chief, the DG ISI and foreign minsitry were all different from each other.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Khan’s lawyer Shoaib Shaheen argued that safeguarding documents was not the job of a prime minister but of his principal secretary. He added that the Azam Khan, who was principal secretary at the time, had neither been nominated in the case or questioned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Salman Safdar also argued that the minsitry of interior had ‘hijacked’ the case when the actual recipient of the cipher was the foreign ministry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, when the time came for arguments from the opposing side, the prosecutor asked the judge to turn all irrelevant people out of the courtroom or ask them to take oath.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The judge then turned out everyone from the courtroom including members of the media. The judgement was reserved after the prosecution completed its arguments.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>A special court in Islamabad rejected bail applications filed by Imran Khan and Shah Mahmood Qureshi in the cipher case on Thursday.</strong></p>
<p>Judge Abu Alhasnaat Zulqurnain announced the reserved the judgement after hearing arguments from both sides in Thursday’s hearing.</p>
<p>Asad Umar was granted bail in the same case earlier in the day.</p>
<p>The case, registered under the Official Secrets Act, accuses former Prime Minister Khan and former Foreign Minister Qureshi of disclosing the contents of the a diplomatic cipher sent by Pakistan’s ambassador in Washington.</p>
<p>Waving a piece of paper in a public rally, Imran had alleged the cipher contained proof of a conspiracy to oust him from power, weeks before his government ended through a no-confidence vote.</p>
<h2><a id="the-hearing" href="#the-hearing" class="heading-permalink" aria-hidden="true" title="Permalink"></a>The hearing</h2>
<p>The judge questioned why the copy of the cipher had gone missing when it was a classified document. He also remarked that the copies of the cipher in possession of the army chief, the DG ISI and foreign minsitry were all different from each other.</p>
<p>Khan’s lawyer Shoaib Shaheen argued that safeguarding documents was not the job of a prime minister but of his principal secretary. He added that the Azam Khan, who was principal secretary at the time, had neither been nominated in the case or questioned.</p>
<p>Salman Safdar also argued that the minsitry of interior had ‘hijacked’ the case when the actual recipient of the cipher was the foreign ministry.</p>
<p>However, when the time came for arguments from the opposing side, the prosecutor asked the judge to turn all irrelevant people out of the courtroom or ask them to take oath.</p>
<p>The judge then turned out everyone from the courtroom including members of the media. The judgement was reserved after the prosecution completed its arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Pakistan</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/30333666</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 15:54:55 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Fahad Bashir)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2023/09/14141811202a4a4.webp?r=142206" type="image/webp" medium="image" height="480" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2023/09/14141811202a4a4.webp?r=142206"/>
        <media:title>File photo.
</media:title>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
