<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Pakistan</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:07:21 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:07:21 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>Toshakhana judge disowns posts made from his Facebook account</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/30327725/toshakhana-judge-disowns-posts-made-from-his-facebook-account</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Toshakhana trial took a new turn on Tuesday as Imran Khan’s lawyers expressed distrust in the presiding judge.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Imran Khan’s lawyer, Gohar Ali, showed Facebook posts from Judge Humayun Dilawar’s account to argue that he should not hear the case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In response, Dilawar said that the account was indeed his own but he had not made the posts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He also asked the PTI lawyer if he thought that a judicial inquiry should be made about the Facebook posts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gohar Ali replied that it was upto the judge to send the posts through a judicial inquiry, but it was appropriate if the court did not continue to hear the case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The court reserved decision on Imran Khan’s request of exmeption from in-person hearing as well as the regarding PTI’s concerns about the judge.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Toshakhana trial took a new turn on Tuesday as Imran Khan’s lawyers expressed distrust in the presiding judge.</strong></p>
<p>Imran Khan’s lawyer, Gohar Ali, showed Facebook posts from Judge Humayun Dilawar’s account to argue that he should not hear the case.</p>
<p>In response, Dilawar said that the account was indeed his own but he had not made the posts.</p>
<p>He also asked the PTI lawyer if he thought that a judicial inquiry should be made about the Facebook posts.</p>
<p>Gohar Ali replied that it was upto the judge to send the posts through a judicial inquiry, but it was appropriate if the court did not continue to hear the case.</p>
<p>The court reserved decision on Imran Khan’s request of exmeption from in-person hearing as well as the regarding PTI’s concerns about the judge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Pakistan</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/30327725</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 12:26:28 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Asif Naveed)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2023/07/18115107e5ba7dd.webp?r=122636" type="image/webp" medium="image" height="480" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2023/07/18115107e5ba7dd.webp?r=122636"/>
        <media:title>File photo.
</media:title>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
