<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Business &amp; Economy</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 14:10:49 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 14:10:49 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>New York Times says it won’t pay for Twitter verified check mark</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/30316880/new-york-times-says-it-wont-pay-for-twitter-verified-check-mark</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;The New York Times&lt;/em&gt; will not pay a monthly fee to get verified check mark status on Twitter, a spokesperson for the newspaper said hours after it lost the verified badge on the social media platform.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to new Twitter policy, verified check marks are now offered only through a paid subscription. Organizations will have to shell out $1,000 a month to obtain gold check marks while individuals can get blue checks for a starting price of $7 in the United States.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“We also will not reimburse reporters for Twitter Blue for personal accounts, except in rare instances where this status would be essential for reporting purposes,” the spokesperson added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Politico&lt;/em&gt; also will not offer to pay for its staff’s Twitter blue verifications, according to a memo sent to staff seen by &lt;em&gt;Reuters&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Twitter had previously announced that from April 1 several accounts will lose the check marks as the social media company begins winding down its legacy verified programme.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Twitter did not respond to a &lt;em&gt;Reuters&lt;/em&gt; request for comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Axios&lt;/em&gt; previously reported that The White House will not pay to have its staff’s official Twitter profiles continue to be verified.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>The New York Times</em> will not pay a monthly fee to get verified check mark status on Twitter, a spokesperson for the newspaper said hours after it lost the verified badge on the social media platform.</strong></p>
<p>According to new Twitter policy, verified check marks are now offered only through a paid subscription. Organizations will have to shell out $1,000 a month to obtain gold check marks while individuals can get blue checks for a starting price of $7 in the United States.</p>
<p>“We also will not reimburse reporters for Twitter Blue for personal accounts, except in rare instances where this status would be essential for reporting purposes,” the spokesperson added.</p>
<p><em>Politico</em> also will not offer to pay for its staff’s Twitter blue verifications, according to a memo sent to staff seen by <em>Reuters</em>.</p>
<p>Twitter had previously announced that from April 1 several accounts will lose the check marks as the social media company begins winding down its legacy verified programme.</p>
<p>Twitter did not respond to a <em>Reuters</em> request for comment.</p>
<p><em>Axios</em> previously reported that The White House will not pay to have its staff’s official Twitter profiles continue to be verified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Business &amp; Economy</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/30316880</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2023 21:08:42 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (Reuters)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2023/04/02210822250a1ca.jpg?r=210842" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" height="480" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2023/04/02210822250a1ca.jpg?r=210842"/>
        <media:title>A pedestrian walks by the New York Times building in Manhattan, New York, US on December 8, 2022. Reuters
</media:title>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
