<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aaj TV English News - Pakistan</title>
    <link>https://english.aaj.tv/</link>
    <description>Aaj TV English</description>
    <language>en-Us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 21:57:44 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 21:57:44 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>IHC asks PTI to remove section-144 from Punjab, KP, then come to court</title>
      <link>https://english.aaj.tv/news/30300789/ihc-asks-pti-to-remove-section-144-from-punjab-kp-then-come-to-court</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday reserved judgment on maintainability of the PTI’s petition challenging actions under section-144.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The court asked the petitioner to remove this law through the assemblies of Punjab and KPK first where his party was already in power, and then come here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chief Justice Athar Minallah heard the case filed by PTI’s Secretary General Asad Umar.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The petitioner adopted the stance that the law of section-144 was unconstitutional and it was used to stop the peaceful protests. British rule had introduced this law which still exists in the country, he added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The court inquired that how the petitioner was an affectee of this law. Whether anyone stopped Asad Umar from taking out a peaceful protest, it asked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The chief justice remarked that the top court had declared the permission compulsory for everyone to hold a peaceful protest. The court questioned whether the petitioner’s party had not imposed section-144 in two provinces where it was in power.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whether the PTI government didn’t impose section 144 when in the federation, he asked.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday reserved judgment on maintainability of the PTI’s petition challenging actions under section-144.</strong></p>
<p>The court asked the petitioner to remove this law through the assemblies of Punjab and KPK first where his party was already in power, and then come here.</p>
<p>Chief Justice Athar Minallah heard the case filed by PTI’s Secretary General Asad Umar.</p>
<p>The petitioner adopted the stance that the law of section-144 was unconstitutional and it was used to stop the peaceful protests. British rule had introduced this law which still exists in the country, he added.</p>
<p>The court inquired that how the petitioner was an affectee of this law. Whether anyone stopped Asad Umar from taking out a peaceful protest, it asked.</p>
<p>The chief justice remarked that the top court had declared the permission compulsory for everyone to hold a peaceful protest. The court questioned whether the petitioner’s party had not imposed section-144 in two provinces where it was in power.</p>
<p>Whether the PTI government didn’t impose section 144 when in the federation, he asked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Pakistan</category>
      <guid>https://english.aaj.tv/news/30300789</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 19:04:17 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (APP)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.aaj.tv/large/2022/10/1019033396151cb.jpg?r=190417" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" height="412" width="700">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.aaj.tv/thumbnail/2022/10/1019033396151cb.jpg?r=190417"/>
        <media:title>Representational image
</media:title>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
